Changes

From Wazeopedia

Template:Lock Standard State

11,357 bytes added, 5 months ago
m
no edit summary
</noinclude>
<includeonly>{{#switch: {{uc:{{{1|}}}{{{st|}}}{{{ST|}}}{{{St|}}}{{{sT|}}}}}
| CA NJ| DE| PA| NORTHEAST = {{Locking Standard <!-- per Regional SM Hangout discussion with OrbitC https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=566569&t=92230&hilit=lock+standard&start=10 177663 --> |title=Major Areas |title2=Remote Areas |title3=Northern Urban (per DwarfLord)Statewide |Fwy=5|Fwy2=4|PS=2|mH3=3}}| NM = {{Locking Standard | Fwy=5 | Ramp=5 | MH = 4 | mH = 3|PS=2}} <!--same link + state page-->| NEWENGLANDTEST = {{Locking Standard <!-- per HO discussion with OrbitC same as NORTHEAST with special guidance --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=Highest rank of connected segmentsegments |MH=43 |mH=3 |PS=21 (Auto) |noteStreet=Exception: At the request of an AM 1 (or other trusted local editorAuto) a [[State Manager]] |Private=1 (SMAuto) may optionally lower an entire area |note={{Red|Do Not Mass Edit just to update locks to facilitate local editing. Requests must be formally recorded in the [https://www.waze.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=622 US Unlock Forum]these standards}}, but these can be discussed and pre-approved by an SM beforehand. The AM should request adjusted as you find them while editing other aspects of the locks be raised again to standard when the area has stabilized; the request should be made in the same thread where the unlock was originally requested. SMs should use caution when uplocking an area to standard: If the area is consistently locked below standardsegments such as FC, speed limits, it might have been granted such an exceptionnaming, and should not be uplocked without verificationetc.}}
Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and protect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL|micro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}}
| NH
| VT
| MA
| RI
| CT
| ME
| NEW ENGLAND MA = {{Locking Standard<!-- per https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=569&t=177663 and https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=618&t=248085 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments |MH=4 |mH=3 |PS=1 (Auto) |Street=1 (Auto) |Private=1 (Auto) |note={{Red| NJDo Not Mass Edit just to update locks to these standards}}, these can be adjusted as you find them while editing other aspects of the segments such as FC, speed limits, naming, etc. Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and protect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL| DEmicro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}} | NORTHEAST NEW ENGLAND = {{Locking Standard <!-- per forum Regional SM HO discussion with OrbitC and old template on 2/11/16 https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=945&t=177664&p=1328584#p1328582 --> |title=StatewideCT/MA/ME/NH/RI/VT |Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segment|MH=4|mH=3|PS=21 (Auto)|Street=1 (Auto)|Private=1 (Auto) |note={{Red|Do Not Mass Edit just to update locks to these standards}}, these can be adjusted as you find them while editing other aspects of the segments such as FC, speed limits, naming, etc. Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and protect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL|micro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}}
| NY = {{Locking Standard<!-- https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=569&t=177663 -->
|title=NYC Only
|Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segment|MH=5|mH=4|PS=3|Street=1(Auto)
|title2=Everywhere Else
|MH2=43|mH2=3|PS2=2}}<!--A/p wiki-->| PA = {{Locking Standard|title=Statewide|Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segment|MH=4|mH=3|PS=21 (Auto)|Street=1(Auto)|PLRPrivate=2{{ref1 (Auto) |PLR}}|appendnote={{noteRed|PLR|1Do Not Mass Edit just to update locks to these standards}}This rule should primarily apply to LARGE parking lots , these can be adjusted as you find them while editing other aspects of the segments such as shopping malls/centers/plazasFC, speed limits, tourist attractions/sports/music venuesnaming, large office buildings etc. Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and schools/collegesprotect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL|micro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}}<!--A/p wiki-->
| TX = {{Locking Standard
|lede=In Texas we have a set minimum standard for locking roads based on segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be locked '''at least''' to the rank (level) in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower. If you find a road locked to a higher level than its minimum, please leave it locked no lower than that level when you have finished editing.
|title=Lock Level
|Fwy=5
|Highest Rank of Connected SegmentRamp=4 |MH=54 |mH=43 |PS=32 |Private=2 |Street=Automatic (1) |Private=Inquire with RC or SM}}
| CA = {{Locking Standard
|title=Metro Areas
|title2=Rural
|Fwy=5
|Ramp=5
|MH=3
|MH2=2
|mH=2
|PS=2
|Street=1}}
| UT = {{Locking Standard <!-- Per Jemay, 2015-11-19. Temporary lowering from 54-4/3-3/2-2 to 4H322 per herrchin/AoTB/Bretmcvey 2016-06-01-->
|caption=Utah locking standard
|title=Statewide
|Fwy=4
|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments
|MH=3
|mH=2
|PS=2
|Street=1
|lede=In {{RootPage2}} we have a set minimum standard for locking roads based on segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be locked '''at least''' to the rank (level) in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower.
}}
| NV = {{Locking Standard <!-- As per State Forum discussions, SuperDave1426, 2015-01-28 -->
|title=Urban Areas
|Private=Automatic (1)
|PLR=Automatic (1)
|append=At-grade connectors (AGCs) should be locked at the highest rank (level) segment they connect to.
}}
| CO = {{Locking Standard <!-- JoshJMM CO SM - 2017-09-16 -->
|Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest Rank of Connected Segment|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
| NM
| SOUTHWEST = {{Locking Standard <!-- per Jemay - 2015-11-25 -->
|Fwy=5|Ramp=4|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1
|lede=Actual locks used may be more or less than values in the table, depending on area circumstance. Please consult the RC, SM, or appropriate AM for guidance.
}}
| AZ = {{Locking Standard <!-- per nnote - 2017-01-25 -->
|Fwy=4|Ramp=4|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
 
 
| MO = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 -->
|title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
| KS = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 -->
|title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
| MN = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 -->
|title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
 
| IA = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 -->
|title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
 
| NE = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 -->
|title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
 
| WV = {{Locking Standard <!-- 2015-07-06, stephenr1966, as discussed within state -->
|caption=West Virginia Locking Rank Standard Guideline
|Fwy=5|Ramp=4|MH=3|mH=2|PS=1
|lede=Actual locks used may be more or less than values in the table below, depending on area circumstance
Please consult the RC, SM, or appropriate AM for guidance
}}
| VA = {{Locking Standard
|caption=Virginia Locking Rank Standard Guideline
|title2=Rural|MH2=3|mH2=2|PS2=1
|lede=Actual locks used may be more or less than values in the table below, depending on area circumstance
Please consult the RC, SM, or appropriate AM for guidance }}| WASHDC = {{Locking Standard |caption=Washington, DC Locking Rank Standard Guideline |Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2 |lede=Actual locks used may be more or less than values in the table below, depending on area circumstance Please consult the RC, SM, or appropriate AM for guidance
}}
| SOUTHERN = {{Locking Standard
|Fwy=5|Ramp=5|MH=5|mH=4|PS=3
|lede=
There are some cases that do not adhere to this standard, such as military base gates (6), and any theme park type areas in Orlando (5/6). Further, all gates at gated communities / private installation should be locked to at least 5.
}}
| AZ PR| VI| AS| GUAM| NMI| TERRITORIES = {{Locking Standard|title=Statewide|Fwy=5|Ramp=4|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}<!-- Per nnote, RC-->| OK = {{Locking Standard|title=Statewide|Fwy=5|Ramp=4|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1|Private=2}}| MD = {{Locking Standard <!-- a/p Fredo_p AZ SMKodi, nzahn1 SMs --> |title=Urban |title2=Rural |Fwy=5|Fwy2=4 |Ramp=5|Ramp2=4 |MH=3|MH2=2 |mH=2 |PS=2 }}| MIDATLANTIC = {{Locking Standard |title=Two-Way |Fwy=5 |Ramp=4 |MH=4 |mH=3 |PS=2 |Street=1 |title2=One-Way |PS2=3 |Street2=2}} | IN| MI| OH| WI| GLR = <!--per discussion on Discord with GLR SMs and at https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=943&t=272395-->{{Locking Standard|lede=The following defines a set of ''minimum'' locking standards proposed for all '''roads''' within {{RootPage2}}.Any road of a certain type or category must be locked at least to the level in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower. It is understood that more rural or inactive areas may not yet meet this standard: editors are encouraged to recruit and mentor additional editors to build coverage.  A great time to implement these locks is while bringing the road types of an area into compliance with the current US road type standards (FC and highway systems). Lock the roads based on type after they've been set to current [[Road types#Quick_reference_chart|US Road Type Standards]].|caption={{RootPage2}} Minimum Road Locking Standard|title=Two-way|title2={{Spaces|1}}One-way{{Spaces|1}}|Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest lock of connected segment|mH=3|PS=2|PS2=3|Street=1|Street2=2|Private=1|Private2=2|PLR=1|PLR2=1<sup>see note</sup>|Ferry=5|Runway=5|Other=1|Other2=2|Construction=3|Beacon=6|note=One-way PLRs used outside of parking lots, such as alleys and streets through apartment complexes, should be locked at 2. See [[USA/Great Lakes/Major roads|the GLR major roads page]] for additional information on the standards listed here.}}| IL = <!--per discussion on Discord with Hawkeygoal and other GLR SMs and at https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=943&t=272395-->{{Locking Standard|lede=The following defines a set of ''minimum'' locking standards proposed for all '''roads''' within {{RootPage2}}.Any road of a certain segment type must be locked at least to the level in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower. It is understood that more rural or inactive areas may not yet meet this standard: editors are encouraged to recruit and mentor additional editors to build state-wide coverage.  A great time to implement these locks is while bringing the road types of an area into compliance with the current US road type standards (FC and highway systems). Lock the roads based on type after they've been set to current [[Road types#Quick_reference_chart|US Road Type Standards]].|caption={{RootPage2}} Minimum Road Locking Standard|title={{Spaces|5}}Two-way{{Spaces|4}}|title2={{Spaces|5}}One-way{{Spaces|5}}|title3=Chicago Zone|Fwy=5|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|PS2=3|PS3=3|Street=1|Street2=2|Street3=3|Private=1|Private2=2|Private3=2|PLR=1|PLR2=1<sup>see note</sup>|PLR3=2|Ferry=5|RR=2|Runway=5|Other=1|Other2=3|Other3=3|Construction=3|note=One-way PLRs used outside of parking lots, such as alleys and streets through apartment complexes, should be locked at 2. The ''Chicago Zone'' is bordered by Lake Michigan on the east, the Chicago River on the north and west and Polk on the south. See [[USA/Great Lakes/Major roads|the GLR major roads page]] for additional information on the standards listed here.}}| KY = {{Locking Standard |title=Statewide |Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2 |note=These are minimums and, for protection, certain segments may be at higher lock levels. Locks should be applied after the segments are correct. Remember you are putting your name on it, make sure it is correct.}}| NC = {{Locking Standard |title=Statewide |Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2 |note=Certain areas may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}
| SC = {{Locking Standard
|ledetitle=Statewide |Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2 |note=Certain areas may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}} <!-- a/p crazycaveman SC SM -->| TN ={{Locking Standard |title=CoastalStatewide |Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2}}| ND = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 --> |title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest Rank rank of Connected Segmentsconnected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}| SD = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 --> |title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}| WY = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title2title=UrbanStatewide |Fwy2Fwy=5 |Ramp=5 |MH=3 |mH=3 |Ramp2PS=2 |Street=1 |note=Highest Rank Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of Connected Segments{{RootPage2}}.}}| ID = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |MH2Ramp=5 |MH=3 |mH=3 |mH2PS=2 |Street=1 |note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}| MT = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=5 |MH=3 |mH=3 |PS=2 |Street=1 |note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}| OR = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |title3Fwy=Rural5 |Fwy3Ramp=5 |MH=3 |mH=3 |PS=2 |Ramp3Street=Highest Rank 1 |note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of Connected Segments{{RootPage2}}.}}| WA = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=5 |MH=3 |MH3mH=3 |PS=2 |Street=1 |note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}| AK = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=5 |MH=3 |mH3mH=Automatic3 |PS3PS=Automatic2 |Street=1 |note=Rural Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks may unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}|lede=In {{RootPage2}} we have a set minimum standard for [[Best_map_editing_practice#Locking_Segments|locking roads]] based on the segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be increased locked to Urban locks once an area can '''at least''' the [[Your_Rank_and_Points#Map_Editing_Rank|rank (level)]] in the chart below. Roads may be considered "complete" locked higher for protection and special situations (correct turn restrictionsareas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, road classified appropriatelyimaging inaccuracies, and minimal URsthe like)}} , but should not be locked lower. A great time to implement these locks is while performing the [[Functional_Classification|FC Upgrade]] of an area. Lock the roads based on the type after they've been set to [[Road_types#Quick_reference_chart|FC standards]].<!-- aA/p crazycaveman SC SM wiki-->
| = {{Mbox|type=critical|text={{Red|Error: The Lock Standard State template requires a state/province abbreviation or other equivalent; none was supplied, so no locking scheme can be generated}}}}
| {{Mbox|type=critical|text={{Red|The Lock Standard State template cannot display the locking scheme because it does not recognize the state/province/region specified: {{{1|}}}{{{st|}}}{{{ST|}}}{{{St|}}}{{{sT|}}}}}}}
}}</includeonly>
122
edits