Changes

From Wazeopedia

Template:Lock Standard State

5,411 bytes added, 4 months ago
m
no edit summary
</noinclude>
<includeonly>{{#switch: {{uc:{{{1|}}}{{{st|}}}{{{ST|}}}{{{St|}}}{{{sT|}}}}}
| NJ
| DE
| PA
| NORTHEAST = {{Locking Standard<!-- per Regional SM Hangout discussion with OrbitC https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=569&t=177663 -->
|title=Statewide
|Fwy=5
|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments
|MH=3
|mH=3
|PS=1 (Auto)
|Street=1 (Auto)
|Private=1 (Auto)
|note={{Red|Do Not Mass Edit just to update locks to these standards}}, these can be adjusted as you find them while editing other aspects of the segments such as FC, speed limits, naming, etc.
 
Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and protect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL|micro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}}
| NH
| VT
| MA
| RI
| CT
| ME
| NEW ENGLANDMA = {{Locking Standard<!-- per Regional SM HO discussion with OrbitC on 2/11/16 https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=945569&t=177664&p=1328584#p1328582 -->| NJ| DE| PA| NORTHEAST = {{Locking Standard<!-- per Regional SM Hangout discussion with OrbitC 177663 and https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=569618&t=177663 248085 -->
|title=Statewide
|Fwy=5
|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments
|MH=34
|mH=3
|PS=1 (Auto)
|Street=1 (Auto)
|Private=1 (Auto)
|note={{Red|Do Not Mass Edit just to update locks to these standards}}, these can be adjusted as you find them while editing other aspects of the segments such as FC, speed limits, naming, etc. Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and protect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL|micro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}} | NEW ENGLAND = {{Locking Standard<!-- per Regional SM HO discussion with OrbitC on 2/11/16 https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=945&t=177664&p=1328584#p1328582 --> |title=CT/MA/ME/NH/RI/VT |Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segment|MH=4|mH=3|PS=1 (Auto)|Street=1 (Auto)|Private=1 (Auto) |note={{Red|Do Not Mass Edit just to update locks to these standards}}, these can be adjusted as you find them while editing other aspects of the segments such as FC, speed limits, naming, etc. Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and protect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL|micro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}}
Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and protect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms/USA|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL|micro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}}
| NY = {{Locking Standard <!-- https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=569&t=177663 -->
|title=NYC Only
|title2=Everywhere Else
|MH2=3|mH2=3|PS2=1 (Auto)|Street=1 (Auto)|Private=1 (Auto)
|note={{Red|Do Not Mass Edit just to update locks to these standards}}, these can be adjusted as you find them while editing other aspects of the segments such as FC, speed limits, naming, etc.
Some segments still warrant higher locks and care should be taken when setting segment lock to these standards to look for and protect these special setups with higher locks. Some examples; segments which are part of [[Detour Prevention Mechanisms/USA|BDP]], [[Uturn prevention|U-turn prevention]], or using [[Glossary#mDL|micro-doglegs]], or other complex intersection setups.}}<!--A/p wiki-->
| TX = {{Locking Standard
|lede=In Texas we have a set minimum standard for locking roads based on segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be locked '''at least''' to the rank (level) in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower. If you find a road locked to a higher level than its minimum, please leave it locked no lower than that level when you have finished editing.
|title=Lock Level
|Fwy=5
|Ramp=Highest Rank of Connected Segment4 |MH=54 |mH=43 |PS=32 |Private=2 |Street=Automatic (1) |Private=Inquire with RC or SM}}
| CA = {{Locking Standard
|PS=2
|Street=1}}
| UT = {{Locking Standard <!-- Per Jemay, 2015-11-19 . Temporary lowering from 54-4/3-3/2-2 to 4H322 per herrchin/AoTB/Bretmcvey 2016-06-01-->
|caption=Utah locking standard
|title=Urban |title2=RuralStatewide |Fwy=54 |Ramp=4Highest rank of connected segments |MH=4|MH2=3 |mH=3|mH2=2
|PS=2
|Street=1
|lede=In {{RootPage2}} we have a set minimum standard for locking roads based on segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be locked '''at least''' to the rank (level) in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower.
}}
| NV = {{Locking Standard <!-- As per State Forum discussions, SuperDave1426, 2015-01-28 -->
|PLR=Automatic (1)
}}
| CO = {{Locking Standard <!-- per Random sample from the map JoshJMM CO SM - 20152017-1109-25 16 --> |Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest Rank of Connected Segment|MH=34|mH=23|PS=2|Street=1}}| AZ
| NM
| SOUTHWEST = {{Locking Standard <!-- per Jemay - 2015-11-25 -->
|Fwy=5|Ramp=4|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1
|lede=Actual locks used may be more or less than values in the table, depending on area circumstance. Please consult the RC, SM, or appropriate AM for guidance.
}}
| AZ = {{Locking Standard <!-- per nnote - 2017-01-25 -->
|Fwy=4|Ramp=4|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
 
 
| MO = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 -->
|title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
| MO KS = {{Locking Standard <!-- a/p BlueTiger68 MO SM Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 --> |title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=4Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
| KS MN = {{Locking Standard <!-- KCConfirmed by ehepner1977 -guardrail KS SM herrchin 20190716 --> |title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=4Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
| MN IA = {{Locking Standard<!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 --> |title=Urban<ref>This includes any city over [http://www.city-data.com/city/Minnesota.html 6,000 people]</ref>Statewide|Fwy=54|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=43|mH=3|PS=2<ref>Increase lock level to 3 if [[House_numbers|House Numbering]] is correct</ref>|Street=1<ref>Increase lock level to 2 if [[House_numbers|House Numbering]] is correct</ref> |title2=Rural<ref>This includes any area considered a township or a small town</ref>|Fwy2=5|Ramp2=Highest rank of connected segments|MH2=3|mH2=2|PS2=2|Street2=1<ref>Increase lock level to 2 if [[House_numbers|House Numbering]] is correct</ref>|lede=In {{RootPage2}} we have a set minimum standard for [[Best_map_editing_practice#Locking_Segments|locking roads]] based on the segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be locked to '''at least''' the [[Your_Rank_and_Points#Map_Editing_Rank|rank (level)]] in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower.
A great time to implement these locks is while performing the [[Functional_Classification|FC Upgrade]] NE = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 --> |title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of an area. Lock the roads based on the type after they've been set to [[Road_types/USA#Quick_reference_chartconnected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|FC standards]].Street=1}}
| WV = {{Locking Standard <!-- 2015-07-06, stephenr1966, as discussed within state -->
|Fwy=5|Ramp=4|MH=3|mH=2|PS=1
|lede=Actual locks used may be more or less than values in the table below, depending on area circumstance
Please consult the RC, SM, or appropriate AM for guidance
}}
| VA = {{Locking Standard
|title2=Rural|MH2=3|mH2=2|PS2=1
|lede=Actual locks used may be more or less than values in the table below, depending on area circumstance
Please consult the RC, SM, or appropriate AM for guidance
}}
| WASHDC = {{Locking Standard
|Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2
|lede=Actual locks used may be more or less than values in the table below, depending on area circumstance
Please consult the RC, SM, or appropriate AM for guidance
}}
| SOUTHERN = {{Locking Standard
|Fwy=5|Ramp=5|MH=5|mH=4|PS=3
|lede=
There are some cases that do not adhere to this standard, such as military base gates (6), and any theme park type areas in Orlando (5/6). Further, all gates at gated communities / private installation should be locked to at least 5.
}}
| PR
| NMI
| TERRITORIES = {{Locking Standard|title=Statewide|Fwy=5|Ramp=4|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}<!-- Per nnote, RC-->
| OK = {{Locking Standard|title=Statewide|Fwy=5|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segment4|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1|Private=2}}
| MD = {{Locking Standard <!-- a/p Kodi, nzahn1 SMs -->
|title=Urban
|PS=2
}}
| MIDATLANTIC = {{Locking Standard
|title=Two-Way
|Fwy=5
|Ramp=4
|MH=4
|mH=3
|PS=2
|Street=1
|title2=One-Way
|PS2=3
|Street2=2}}
 
| IN
| MI
| OH
| WI
| GLR = <!--per discussion on Discord with GLR SMs and at https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=943&t=272395-->{{Locking Standard|lede=The following defines a set of ''minimum'' locking standards proposed for all '''roads''' within {{RootPage2}}.
Any road of a certain type or category must be locked at least to the level in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower.
 
It is understood that more rural or inactive areas may not yet meet this standard: editors are encouraged to recruit and mentor additional editors to build coverage.
A great time to implement these locks is while bringing the road types of an area into compliance with the current US road type standards (FC and highway systems). Lock the roads based on type after they've been set to current [[Road types#Quick_reference_chart|US Road Type Standards]].| MI caption= {{RootPage2}} Minimum Road Locking Standard |caption=Michigan locking standard |title=Urban Two-way|title2=Rural {{Spaces|1}}One-way{{Spaces|1}}|Fwy=5 |Ramp=Highest rank lock of connected segment |MHmH=3|PS=2|PS2=3 |mHStreet=1|Street2=2|Private=1|Private2=2|PLR=1|PLR2=1<sup>see note</sup>|Ferry=5|Runway=5|Other=1|Other2=2|mH2Construction=3 |PSBeacon=6|note=One-way PLRs used outside of parking lots, such as alleys and streets through apartment complexes, should be locked at 2. See [[USA/Great Lakes/Major roads|the GLR major roads page]] for additional information on the standards listed here.}} | IL = <!--per discussion on Discord with Hawkeygoal and other GLR SMs and at https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=943&t=272395-->{{Locking Standard|lede=The following defines a set of ''minimum'' locking standards proposed for all '''roads''' within {{RootPage2}}.Any road of a certain segment type must be locked at least to the level in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower. It is understood that more rural or inactive areas may not yet meet this standard: editors are encouraged to recruit and mentor additional editors to build state-wide coverage.
A great time to implement these locks is while bringing the road types of an area into compliance with the current US road type standards (FC and highway systems). Lock the roads based on type after they've been set to current [[Road types#Quick_reference_chart|US Road Type Standards]].| WI caption= {{RootPage2}} Minimum Road Locking Standard |title=Statewide {{Spaces|5}}Two-way{{Spaces|4}}|Fwytitle2={{Spaces|5}}One-way{{Spaces|5}}|Ramptitle3=Highest rank of connected segmentChicago Zone|Fwy=5|MH=3|mH=23|PS=2|PS2=3|PS3=3|Street=1 |Street2=2|Street3=3|Private=1|Private2=2|Private3=2|PLR=1|PLR2=1<sup>see note</sup>|PLR3=2|Ferry=5|RR=2|Runway=5|Other=1|Other2=3|Other3=3|Construction=3|note=These are minimums One-way PLRs used outside of parking lots, such as alleys andstreets through apartment complexes, for protection, certain segments may should be set locked at higher lock levels2. In these casesThe ''Chicago Zone'' is bordered by Lake Michigan on the east, please contact the last editor or a {{RootPage2}} SM before editing Chicago River on the north and west and Polk on the segmentssouth. Once changes have been made and verified, See [[USA/Great Lakes/Major roads|the GLR major roads page]] for additional information on the locks should be returned to their elevated levels, unless standard levels are approved by a {{RootPage2standards listed here.}} SM}}<!-- per GHO KB_Steveo, 2015-12-26 -->
| KY = {{Locking Standard
|title=Statewide
|title=Statewide
|Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2
|note=Certain areas may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or a SM of {{RootPage2}} SM.}}
| SC = {{Locking Standard
|title=Statewide
|Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2
|note=Certain areas may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or a SM of {{RootPage2}} SM.}} <!-- a/p crazycaveman SC SM -->
| TN = {{Locking Standard
|title=Statewide
|Fwy=5|MH=4|mH=3|PS=2}}
| ND = {{Locking Standard <!-- As per bretmcvey 2016Confirmed by ehepner1977 -04herrchin 20190716 --> |title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}| SD = {{Locking Standard <!-- Confirmed by ehepner1977 - herrchin 20190716 --> |title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=Highest rank of connected segments|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}| WY = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=45 |Ramp=45 |MH=3 |mH=3 |PS=2 |Street=1 |note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}| WY ID = {{Locking Standard <!-- Preliminary proposal subject to discussion Approved by all NWR SMs and approval RC - TheChrisK, 20152017-1209-18 26 --> |title=Urban AreasStatewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=5 |MH=3 |mH=3 |PS=2 |Street=1 |title2note=Rural AreasCertain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}| MT = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=45 |Ramp=45 |MH=43 |mH=3 |PS=2 |Street=1 |note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}| OR = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=5 |MH2MH=3 |mH=3 |mH2PS=2 |Street=1 |note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}| WA = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=5 |MH=3 |mH=3 |PS=2 |PS2Street=1 |note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or SM of {{RootPage2}}.}}| AK = {{Locking Standard <!-- Approved by all NWR SMs and RC - TheChrisK, 2017-09-26 --> |title=Statewide |Fwy=5 |Ramp=5 |MH=3 |mH=3 |PS=2
|Street=1
|note=Certain roads may be locked higher than the above minimums. Please do not lower locks unless approved by the RC or a SM of {{RootPage2}} SM.}}| AK = {{Locking Standard<!--per HO discussion with AlanOfTheBerg and AK state manager-->|title=Statewide|Fwy=4|Ramp=4|MH=3|mH=2|PS=2|Street=1|PLR=2{{ref|PLR}}|append={{note|PLR|1}}This rule should primarily apply to LARGE parking lots such as shopping malls/centers/plazas, tourist attractions/sports/music venues, large office buildings and schools/colleges.}}| OR = {{Locking Standard <!--As confirmed by AlanOfTheBerg--> |title=Statewide |Fwy=4 |Ramp=4 |MH=3 |mH=2 |PS=2 |Street=1}}
|lede=In {{RootPage2}} we have a set minimum standard for [[Best_map_editing_practice#Locking_Segments|locking roads]] based on the segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be locked to '''at least''' the [[Your_Rank_and_Points#Map_Editing_Rank|rank (level)]] in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower.
A great time to implement these locks is while performing the [[Functional_Classification|FC Upgrade]] of an area. Lock the roads based on the type after they've been set to [[Road_types/USA#Quick_reference_chart|FC standards]].<!--A/p wiki-->
| = {{Mbox|type=critical|text={{Red|Error: The Lock Standard State template requires a state/province abbreviation or other equivalent; none was supplied, so no locking scheme can be generated}}}}
| {{Mbox|type=critical|text={{Red|The Lock Standard State template cannot display the locking scheme because it does not recognize the state/province/region specified: {{{1|}}}{{{st|}}}{{{ST|}}}{{{St|}}}{{{sT|}}}}}}}
}}</includeonly>
122
edits